Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Market Gems-Trading Strong Earnings Growth and Momentum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jenna who wrote (4067)	2/7/2001 11:26:19 PM
From: Darth Trader	Respond to of 6445

Anybody know where I can get info on how much return would have generated if one would have went to cash on the S&P everytime it dropped below to 50 dma, and went long on the S&P everytime it went back up over the S&P for, say, the last 30 years? thank you. ---------> May the Trend be with You <----------------

To: Jenna who wrote (4067)	2/8/2001 12:07:43 AM
From: TraderXx	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6445

re: BRL....something looks kinda fishy here. Received a sell rating today (not too often that happens) thestreet.com biz.yahoo.com biz.yahoo.com With earnings coming out today feb 8th and conference call I don't expect the news to be too good. TraderXx <---------short BRL

To: Jenna who wrote (4067)	2/8/2001 9:15:02 AM
From: Dave Gore	Respond to of 6445

Thanks Jenna, will watch it. Lots to watch this morning, even on the long side. Even outside of tech. Interesting that many retailers except the mass consumer ones are warning. KM, COST, WMT doing well in s/s sales, only other bright spot may be RL. Abby says they are getting back in to them yesterday. Robbie selects 3 optical stocks, so checking them out. Also, some other stuff to go over. Incidentally ARBA is now less than 60 times next years earnings. Stuff is getting cheaper. PS-- WCOM met expectations, not great but ok. I see the future are up nicely. Thanks for the analysis, as always. Dave