SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Nuvo Research Inc -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tom Gordon who wrote (6711)2/8/2001 2:20:49 PM
From: wilyolvet  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 14101
 
Tom:

can only chalk up the SH postings to "old habits are hard to break".....your comment on Nuthouse/Stockhouse is well founded

imo, the early news out of the fda re competitors is better than anyone could have imagined (except maybe for MB) but that has been covered

there was an interesting reply (to me at least) on SH by Compost in response to my belief there is a PR blackout imposed on dmx (PR as opposed to NR's of material changes) during the 20 day trading period that i believe took effect immediately upon the announcement of the deal....Compost's hypothesis is that Acqua may have quietly bought up shares in advance of the announcement and could be using those shares to keep the stock price in check during the 20 day period.....there is no way to prove the hypothesis, but it certainly makes sense to me (even if it is somewhat unethical, but when did that ever stop investment bankers)....essentially, acqua could buy up stock knowing that it would likely be able to sell the shares at a profit "post announcement" and at the same time know that it will be able to replace those shares that it sold for a profit at the discounted rate proposed in the financing agreement.....seems almost too good to be true from acqua's viewpoint

the possible blackout (now day 14 of 20)explains the low volumes and the total lack of interviews by rebecca and the hasty CC on 2Q results with no question period......the possible selling by Acqua explains why the share price is being held down during the pre-arranged "blackout" period, when imo, the stock should be moving up on low volume based upon the fact that the street has been made aware of expected future events with likely timelines

the possibility exists that this type of "game" could be replayed repeatedly over the 13 month drawdown period, but i doubt that will happen as i believe the real show will begin after next friday and Acqua will be happy to use its "grease money" shares as its base

all just theory, but it certainly provides a possible explanation for the peculiar trading since the Acqua announcement