Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Network Appliance -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: waverider who wrote (6255)	2/8/2001 11:35:02 AM
From: JakeStraw	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10934

Diamond H, If you were in fact addressing your post to me I feel I need to clarify one thing. I don't really follow QCOM & don't believe I have even ever posted on that thread.

To: waverider who wrote (6255)	2/8/2001 11:57:21 AM
From: SecularBull	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10934

Another great post on the fundamentals of the business. LoF

To: waverider who wrote (6255)	2/8/2001 12:49:47 PM
From: jmanvegas	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10934

DH: How the hell are you. I took my first position in NTAP 2 days ago trying to be a bottom picker. I got picked apart by Mr. Market. I hope NTAP is not a falling knife from these levels but NTAP has one of the worst looking charts in tech land. Still lower highs and lower lows. I get real suspicious when fund managers tell us to keep their money in some sector when behind the scenes they're selling the crap out of that sector. This is a market that you DON'T trust anyone but yourself. I'm not fighting any battle at all. The folks over here at the NTAP thread are smart and savvy. I was just attempting to trade NTAP but maybe I got caught in a continuous knife falling situation. But that huge gap in the mid 20's - well you know all about that argument. Anyway, take care and tell the folks over at the QCOM thread I said hello. jmanvegas

To: waverider who wrote (6255)	2/8/2001 4:23:46 PM
From: k_maxwell	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10934

Re: <<<<<This is amazing. I have been reading this thread for the past month or so and it is QCOM 2000 all over again. People show up with suggestions that NTAP is overpriced, showing technical weakness (in the charts), or whatever, and the bulls jump all over them...all the wayyyyy dowwnnnnnnnnn.>>>>> Yeah, but QCOM dropped to $50 last summer, and is now $85. Defied the tech wreck trend in Nov.-Dec. Pretty good return if you got in anywhere near the bottom. I don't know where the bottom is on NTAP either, but in the low $30's I'd say the risk/reward looks pretty damn good.