SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : War -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: John Carragher who wrote (788)2/11/2001 7:48:53 AM
From: 2MAR$  Respond to of 23908
 
-Russia eyes arms deals with Iran this year

(Adds Indian plans)
MOSCOW, Feb 11 (Reuters) - Russia's arms export monopoly has
said Moscow could clinch a deal on military-technical
cooperation with Iran this year, Interfax news agency reported
on Sunday.
Viktor Komardin, deputy general director of Rosoboronexport,
said arms deals with Iran could eventually net Moscow up to $300
million a year, and that Defence Minister Igor Sergeyev had
discussed "concrete questions" in Tehran last December.
Russia told the United States last year that Moscow no
longer felt bound by the terms of a 1995 deal to curtail weapons
sales to Iran.
While Sergeyev was in Tehran his Iranian counterpart said
the deal, championed by former U.S. Vice-President Al Gore, had
been "buried by history."
The United States regards Iran as one of the "rogue states"
against whose threat it intends to deploy a space-based missile
defence shield. Moscow staunchly opposes the plan, saying it
could destroy the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile (ABM) Treaty.
Speaking at an international air show in Bangalore, India,
Komardin said contracts could be signed by this summer, and said
France and possibly Germany were also active in the Iranian arms
market, Interfax reported.
Komardin also said Moscow might lease India four Tu-22 M3
bombers, with the possibility of selling them outright later at
their lower, residual cost, Interfax reported. He said the speed
of the deal depended on whether Delhi found funding from its
budget for the 2000-2001 fiscal year, which ends in March.
"If India decides to allocate part of this year's budget to
it, then we can sign the contract by March 31."
Komardin said India, which signed a record arms agreement
with Moscow last year to build 140 Su-30MKI warplanes under
licence, could also clinch a deal in 2001 to buy Russian A-50
Airborne Warning and Control System (AWACS) aircraft,
surveillance planes Russia has been lobbying to sell to China.
Komardin also said Delhi's plan to buy the naval version of
Moscow's MiG-29 jet fighter for its ex-Russian navy aicraft
carrier Admiral Gorshkov was "confirmed in preliminary
documents."
Russia intended to work in the military sphere with
Yugoslavia, Komardin added, as soon as arms sanctions imposed
against former President Slobodan Milosevic were lifted.
"We are gradually starting talks with the Yugoslav side on
re-establishing (arms ties) in the future, after the lifting of
the embargo on military-technical cooperation," he said.
((Moscow newsroom +7 095 241-0101
moscow.newsroom@reuters.com))
REUTERS
*** end of story ***



To: John Carragher who wrote (788)2/12/2001 9:18:37 PM
From: Hawkmoon  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 23908
 
Yeah.. leave it to Barron's to get it's fact wrong.

the Army's Crusader, a heavy-duty tank and Cold
War relic,


The Crusader is an artillery system with the ability MRSI (multiple round, simultaneous impact) a target with up to 8 rounds.

This link explains MSRI:

teamcrusader.com

And here are some links to more information:

teamcrusader.com
teamcrusader.com
teamcrusader.com

Having the ability that 6 crusaders have, namely putting 15 tons of High Explosive on target within a minute is an INCREDIBLE ADVANTAGE.

It will be worth every penny that is paid because it will save the lives of those soldiers who require immediate and massive fire support.

And one battalion of Crusaders can provide the firepower equivalent of 6 current towed or self-propelled howitzers.

But the really nifty thing about Crusader is that it can be completely rearmed by a supply vehicle without anyone having to personally handle a round. It's all automated and there is no crew exposure to the outside.

and lastly, the Air Force's F-22, a top-of-the-line fighter jet that sells for $180 million a
copy.


This I may have more trouble with, being a former grunt(+), but as I understand it, fielding the F-22 will eliminate the need for quite a few other support aircraft (wild-weasels, EF-111 Ravens), as well as THEIR support aircraft (tankers). And the ability to use stealth practically guarantees that would planes will be able to come and go without really being seen, while enjoying the abilty to eliminate enemy aircraft.

However, I could see building the JSF first (if they can expedite the procurement) and hold off on the YF-22 Raptor.
The key to air superiority is stealth. Being able to see them but their not seeing you.

It's also the key to keeping your pilots alive during bombing raids over hostile territory. So if they can demonstrate the ability to build it cheaper and able to meet the requirements of all the services who will use it, that's great.

But it really appalling that Barron's could screw up this story so badly. We can hardly call an advanced artillery system "cold war" technology, let alone confuse it with being a replacement for a tank. There will be ALWAYS be a need for artillery in any conventional war, and especially in a guerilla war.

Btw, I'm I'm neutral on the Osprey as I don't quite believe it is as combat rugged as existing helicopters. However, there is tremendous pressure to pursue it because of the potential civilian spin-offs for VERTOL technology.

Thanks for posting the article though, John... I failed to pick up a copy of that rag this weekend...

Regards,

Ron