Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Stock Attack -- A Complete Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Chris who wrote (42503)	2/10/2001 11:35:29 AM
From: Daveyk	Respond to of 42787

Chris ,It's sad that you had to do that.I agree it's necessary to keep a good thread from going down.Stalking be it cyber or what is not acceptable.Thanks for doing the right thing. Best,Dave

To: Chris who wrote (42503)	2/10/2001 12:26:32 PM
From: Doo	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 42787

LOL!! Good luck in the markets, folks.

To: Chris who wrote (42503)	2/10/2001 3:44:28 PM
From: sam_o	Respond to of 42787

CHRIS>>> Good move..... I THINK YOU DID THE RIGHT THING. I REALLY ENJOY THIS THREAD, AND ALL THE 'CREDITABLE POSTERS' IT ATTRACTS. With the moderated 'you' can moderate appropriately, this way we can eliminate da-muck!! Great idea. I look forward to post here and reading allot. Thanks Chris!

To: Chris who wrote (42503)	2/10/2001 9:38:40 PM
From: bobby beara	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42787

overreaction - this thread has lost it's sense of humor (necessary ingredient for me -g-) and become too self important, censorship has not worked very well on si, rather than placing a banned person on a trophy case to show off to the public, like the low life clowns thread does, why not just put him on the ignore button.

To: Chris who wrote (42503)	2/11/2001 2:17:24 PM
From: Paul Shread	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42787

One comment on the moderated thread, Chris. In general, as I have stated in the past, I am opposed to moderated threads because they breed insular thinking and intolerance of different views. I want my views challenged, albeit in a respectful, factual way; I hope whatever way the thread goes, that can be achieved. I think it's unfortunate that a couple of people have chosen to try to tear down you and Don in particular, rather than engaging your work in a thoughtful way. I don't know how to prevent that sort of destructive attack from happening, but I want to express my wish that Stock Attack, in whatever form it takes, continue to be a place where meaningful, thoughtful exchange can occur, and where dissenting views can be expressed. We may not change anyone else's mind, but we can always go back and say 'I told you so.' <ggg>