SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: The Verve who wrote (7174)2/10/2001 11:50:56 AM
From: Pierre  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 196775
 
I agree, left field. OTOH, might this explain Sulpizio's recent chest thumping about multi mode? Also Sprint has been quite public in touting the advantages of CDMA 2000 and ease of deployment within existing spectrum. Do they have an economic interest in Verizon staying CDMA 2000 such as economies of scale in hand set production, or do the different frequencies make that issue a non-starter?

I really hate to dwell on or add to every bit of negativity, but there's certainly been no end to it. Seems just as one issue gets put to bed - e.g. W-CDMA royalties - another pops up - e.g. delay of W-CDMA roll out. As someone mentioned earlier, maybe that's the price of revolution. They just don't come easy - or very often, for that matter.

Pierre



To: The Verve who wrote (7174)2/10/2001 12:25:00 PM
From: kech  Respond to of 196775
 
I'm betting that the multi-mode chips are for Verizon Wireless and this guy Saunders
is just calling this chip a "W-CDMA" chip or move . It has got to be semantics.