SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : WDC/Sandisk Corporation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bargain Hunter who wrote (19045)2/10/2001 9:59:12 PM
From: Ausdauer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 60323
 
Lexar and MMC

digitalfilm.com./photos/MMC-16MB-packaging.jpg

I hope that SanDisk didn't give away MMC with the '987 settlement...

siliconinvestor.com

As I have asked before...

Message 15317311
Message 15317841
Message 15317889
Message 15317872

First CompactFlash and now MMC.

Deja Vu all over again???

The press release from the settlement mentions only CompactFlash
and PC cards (which I assume represents PCMCIA cards). There is no
mention whatsoever about permission for Lexar to manufacture MMC or SDMC...

siliconinvestor.com

Where is the licensing announcement from SanDisk?

Aus



To: Bargain Hunter who wrote (19045)2/10/2001 10:19:33 PM
From: Ausdauer  Respond to of 60323
 
Canon Powershot A20

photim.com

Aus



To: Bargain Hunter who wrote (19045)2/10/2001 11:08:13 PM
From: Craig Freeman  Respond to of 60323
 
Bargain Hunter, re: "stocks do have "real value", or at least "perceived real value". No disagreement there. Once you added the word "perceived", everything else fell neatly into place.

Bonds (and a very few stocks) have a "real value" because you can compare a known price and yield to alternative investments of similar duration. Tech stocks generally have neither yield nor duration and therefore cannot be valued using traditional methodologies. During the past century, about 98% of all bonds have paid out exactly as shown of the bond's face ... and most of the remaining 2% paid something. On the other hand, you would be hard-put to find many "tech" stocks that have been in existence for even a decade.

IMHO, the term "value" means either 1) the result of a calculation weighing known cash flows over time, or, 2) a relative measure for comparing possible investments and/or purchases. This may sound like a quote from second-semester microeconomics but we all do have choices.

Treasury bills are a perfect example. Because T-bills are so reliable, a person can sell 4-year notes and simultaneously buy an equal amount of 5-year notes, pay no "premium", and know fairly accurately what the possible outcomes will be. On the otherhand, if you buy 1000 shares of SNDK, where do you go to sell an offsetting investment with no premium? Answer: You can't.

IMHO, in today's tech marketplace, value cannot be determined because we can neither compute an absolute value according to "net present value" computations nor can we make accurate relative comparisons. Our time frames are too short and our information too limited to do better than to make an educated guess.

Craig