SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Paul Engel who wrote (28005)2/11/2001 2:24:15 AM
From: BjörnRespond to of 275872
 
Kuala Paulur, "And like typical dorks, your AMDroid bretheren tajke your lies and pile their own lies on top of them - without ever verifiying what I said about Serverworks."

One of the more interesting hits I got re tajke:

nisd.net



To: Paul Engel who wrote (28005)2/11/2001 11:33:15 PM
From: PetzRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
Mr Engel, another personal attack from you is to be expected. I noted that you were "heavily criticizing Serverwork's P3 SMP chipset." I said that because Anand wrote a very positive review of the chipset but you stated that Intel's i840 was better anyway.

I repeat Anand's conclusion so that the thread can judge for themselves:

Without a doubt this is definitely one of the most interesting chipsets we have seen in a while and it does get the job done. The majority of the performance tests were won by the ServerSet III HEsl with less theoretical bandwidth than the i840 chipset and while using regular PC133 SDRAM in comparison to the Pro 266's DDR SDRAM [and i840's dual channel RDRAM]. That is really the reason for the beauty of the chipset, the fact that it can offer such high performance while still using conventional PC133 SDRAM.
www1.anandtech.com

In fact, if you look at the details, the Serverworks HEsI beat the i840 in 11 of 16 benchmarks, and three of the losses were in light-loading and synthetic memory access benchmarks. In real workstation applications like Photoshop, HEsI beat i840 senseless.

So it is not a "lie" to refer to your characterization, that i840 as "extremely competitve" with HEsI, as being "heavy criticism." Since your conclusion was exactly opposite to Anand's, I could have used words like "biased criticism" instead of "heavy criticism," and my characterization would have been accurate and truthful.

Please refrain from personal attacks in the future.

Petz