SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Preference Technologies -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: afrayem onigwecher who wrote (396)2/10/2001 9:43:08 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 460
 
"Passing fraudulent information about can get you into trouble, whether you try to profit from it or not. Because if the victim is harmed by your action, you can be held liable for his or her losses. Stock manipulation schemes are no more legal on the Internet than they were in the mail or over the telephone."

Better watch out then Afrayem

Buyer Beware!!



To: afrayem onigwecher who wrote (396)2/15/2001 10:35:04 AM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 460
 
Hey Afrayem. WHATS UP WITH SKUP?->UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Before the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
Release No. 7952 / February 14, 2001

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
File No. 3-10419
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In the Matter of

MARKETING DIRECT
CONCEPTS, INC. and
MICHAEL A. CALDERONE,

Respondents.

ORDER INSTITUTING A PUBLIC
PROCEEDING PURSUANT TO
SECTION 8A OF THE SECURITIES
ACT OF 1933, MAKING FINDINGS
AND IMPOSING A CEASE-AND-
DESIST ORDER

I.

The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") deems it appropriate that a public proceeding be instituted pursuant to Section 8A of the Securities Act of 1933 ("Securities Act") to determine whether Respondents Marketing Direct Concepts, Inc. ("MDC") and Michael A. Calderone ("Calderone") violated Section 17(b) of the Securities Act.

II.

In anticipation of the institution of these proceedings, MDC and Calderone each have submitted an Offer of Settlement ("Offers") that the Commission has determined to accept. Solely for the purpose of these proceedings and any other proceeding brought by or on behalf of the Commission, or to which the Commission is a party, and prior to a hearing pursuant to the Commission's Rules of Practice, 17 C.F.R. § 201.1 et seq., MDC and Calderone, by their Offers, without admitting or denying the Commission's findings, except that they admit to the Commission's jurisdiction over them and over the subject matter of this proceeding, consent to the entry of this Order Instituting a Public Proceeding Pursuant to Section 8A of the Securities Act of 1933, Making Findings and Imposing a Cease-and-Desist Order (the "Order").

III.

The Commission's Order finds that:

FACTS

A. Respondents

(1) Marketing Direct Concepts, Inc., ("MDC"), at all relevant times, was a privately held Nevada closed corporation that provided advertising services to small, under-publicized public companies.

(2) Michael Anthony Calderone, age 40, is a resident of Las Vegas, Nevada. During all relevant times herein, Calderone was the President and sole shareholder of Marketing Direct Concepts and was solely responsible for MDC's activities.

B. Other Relevant Entity -- Texas American Group, Inc.

Texas American Group, Inc. ("TAG") was incorporated in Texas in 1967 as Texas American Sulphur Company. After existing as a dormant shell for sixteen years, in 1989 TAG registered 1.723 million shares of its common stock pursuant to an S-18 Registration Statement and three amendments thereto. At all times relevant to this matter, TAG was headquartered in Verdi, Nevada.1

In order to generate investor interest in TAG stock, MDC was hired to place an "advertorial" in the in-flight magazines for major U.S. airlines which promoted TAG as an undervalued stock. The advertorial, which ran in the July 1996 editions of the in-flight magazines, contained false claims concerning TAG's purported assets, including a claim that TAG had acquired the second largest independent retailer in the United Kingdom and that TAG had "close to ½ billion dollars in revenue."

C. Underlying Violations

In April of 1996, TAG retained MDC to perform certain promotional services, including the preparation and publication of a national advertisement about TAG, termed an "advertorial." The advertorial, which appeared in the July 1996 editions of in-flight magazines for the major U.S. airlines, touted TAG, described its stock as "extremely undervalued," and contained a "buy recommendation."

MDC was compensated for these promotional services in an amount of $135,000. Additionally, MDC's contract with TAG provided that MDC would receive 1,440,000 shares of TAG's "unregistered Rule 144 common stock." Despite the fact that MDC had received $135,000, and had contracted to receive even more compensation, MDC did not disclose that payment. Instead, it disclosed in small print at the bottom of the TAG advertorial that, "MDC may from time to time have a position in the securities mentioned herein, or receive compensation for the dissemination of information on the company."2

In late 1996 and early 1997, MDC also received compensation for preparing and publishing in-flight magazine advertisements for Diversifax, Inc., Chadmoore Wireless Group, Inc., and Total World Telecommunications, Inc. As with the TAG advertorial, the disclosures accompanying each of these in-flight magazine advertisements were deficient because they failed to disclose the specific fact of and the amount of compensation received for their preparation and publication. In connection with the preparation of the TAG advertorial, MDC and Calderone used information provided to them by the company.

IV.

LEGAL DISCUSSION

Section 17(b) of the Securities Act provides that, "t shall be unlawful for any person, by the use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or by the use of the mails, to publish, give publicity to, or circulate any notice, circular, advertisement, newspaper, article, letter, investment service, or communication which, though not purporting to offer a security for sale, describes such security for a consideration received or to be received, directly or indirectly, from an issuer, underwriter, or dealer, without fully disclosing the receipt, whether past or prospective, of such consideration and the amount thereof." (Emphasis added). Section 17(b) was " particularly designed to meet the evils of the `tipster sheet,' as well as articles in newspapers or periodicals that purport to give an unbiased opinion but which opinions in reality are bought and paid for." House Committee Report No. 85 (1933), 73d Cong., 1st Sess., p. 24.

Calderone and MDC placed in-flight advertorials without disclosing either that MDC had been compensated for placing the advertorials or the amount of compensation received. Even though MDC actually received compensation for publishing the in-flight advertisements that touted TAG, Diversifax, Inc., Chadmoore Wireless Group, Inc., and Total World Telecommunications, Inc., in each instance MDC only disclosed that it "may" have received compensation. By failing to disclose the compensation that was received, the investing public was left with the illusion that the magazine advertisements could be unbiased opinion, rather than one that "in reality [was] bought and paid for" by the issuer of the security. Id. The statute requires that the specific consideration from an issuer must be disclosed, including the amount received. By failing to disclose both that MDC had indeed been compensated for touting TAG, Diversifax, Inc., Chadmoore Wireless Group, Inc., and Total World Telecommunications, Inc., and the amount of such compensation, MDC and Calderone violated Section 17(b) of the Securities Act. See e.g., SEC v. Liberty Capital Group, Inc., 75 F.Supp 2d 1160, 1162 (W.D.Wa. 1999).

V.

FINDINGS

Based on the foregoing, the Commission finds that MDC and Calderone violated Section 17(b) of the Securities Act.

VI.

ORDER

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to Section 8A of the Securities Act, that:

MDC and Calderone CEASE AND DESIST from committing or causing any violation and any future violation of Section 17(b) of the Securities Act.

By the Commission.

Jonathan G. Katz
Secretary

Footnotes
1 On August 11, 2000, the Commission filed suit in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia against Texas American Group, Inc., Alan E. Humphrey (Director and President of TAG), Richard E. Lee (Director of TAG) and William Grosvenor (Chief Executive Officer of TAG). The suit seeks a permanent injunction against future violations of the federal securities laws and civil penalties.

The suit alleges that the defendants engaged in a fraudulent scheme to promote TAG's stock and to evade the registration requirements of the federal securities laws. As part of the fraudulent scheme, the defendants made various false claims of asset ownership in Commission filings, at investor seminars, to TAG's auditors and in in-flight magazine advertisements. Among the assets that the defendants falsely claimed were a vacation resort in Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain, a software-program for Internet lottery and casino games designed for multilingual access by users around the world, a Nevada based hotel development and management company, and a London
Pathology testing service.

2 MDC's disclosure read in its entirety, "This Announcement is not an offer of securities for sale or a solicitation of any offer to buy securities. An offer can be made only with the accompanying Disclosure Documents, and only in the states approved. MDC may from time to time have a position in the securities mentioned herein, or receive compensation for the dissemination of information on the company. The magazine publisher accepts no responsibility for any claims made by the advertiser in the above advertorial."

sec.gov
Last update: 02/14/2001



To: afrayem onigwecher who wrote (396)2/15/2001 11:21:28 AM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 460
 
Now who could they be talking about Isaac?

Preference Technologies Inc. (PFER) Message List Raging

By: saburo $$
Reply To: 285 by buntyfool $$ Wednesday, 14 Feb 2001 at 11:39 PM EST
Post # of 287


I heard that Catalyst is the one who slit Pfer's throat months ago. They are the one's paying themselves before they pay PFER payroll, let alone any debtors or the landlord. And after they pay themselves, I heard little is left for anyone else.

Did you know that the CEO of Catalyst is also the CEO at USAN? And the CEO of USAN is also the same board member representing PFER's new york investor? And that the CEO of Catalyst is also the same one controlling PFER's money? I heard that even the PFER lawyer and ex-president are suing for unpaid bills or loans.

Looks like Catalyst convinced PFER's Israeli investor to make PFER pay for its own demise. And guess who the major investors in USAN are?

I was told that during one company meeting, Calderone stated that the NY investor did not even have the proper broker licenses when he snagged the early investors a year ago.

I'm glad I got out months ago.


ragingbull.lycos.com



To: afrayem onigwecher who wrote (396)2/15/2001 1:54:59 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 460
 
SAF T LOK INC filed this 8-K/A on 02/11/1999
tenkwizard.com

IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the
date first set forth above:

MARKETING DIRECT CONCEPTS, INC.
a Nevada Corporation
By: /s/ Michael Calderone
Michael Calderone, President & CEO


Saf T Lok, Inc
By: /s/ John L. Gardner
John Gardner
==========================================

Saf T Lok chairman, ex-CEO fined

By Stephen Pounds, Palm Beach Post Staff Writer
Thursday, December 21, 2000

WEST PALM BEACH - The chairman and a former chief executive of West Palm Beach-based Saf T Lok Inc. have been fined $55,000 each for lying to investors and to the Securities and Exchange Commission about sales and financial dealings in 1997 and 1998, the SEC said Wednesday.

The SEC's two-year investigation into allegations of fraud involving the company ended Wednesday when Saf T Lok and the two executives agreed to settle a lawsuit filed by the SEC earlier in the day. The suit was filed in U.S. District Court in Miami.

The SEC alleged the company, its founder and Chairman Frank Brooks and former Chief Executive John Gardner provided investors with misleading information about sales, consulting deals and contracts through news releases and SEC filings.

"These disclosures described agreements that, if bonafide, would have resulted in the sale of millions of dollars of Saf T Lok's products," the SEC said.

Some of the violations stem from deals Saf T Lok made with Sholam Weiss, who was convicted last year of racketeering and fraud in connection with the collapse of National Heritage Life Insurance. He was sentenced in absentia to 845 years in prison. Authorities are now trying to extradite him from Austria.

Weiss was not sued by the SEC.

According to the SEC, the company lied about these deals:

Saf T Lok entered into a consulting deal in 1997 with A.B. & Associates of Monsey, N.Y., for $250,000. A.B. was a "shell company" without clients owned by Arthur Braun, a friend of Weiss. Weiss required the consulting deal as part of a $3 million offshore placement of stock he arranged for Saf T Lok. United Safety Action, another Braun company, agreed in 1998 to act as a Saf T Lok distributor and buy $20 million in gun locks. United Safety didn't have the financing to complete the deal.

Saf T Lok signed a contract in 1998 with New York-based Semiconductor Laser International Corp. to design a fingerprint identification-based gun lock when it couldn't afford to finance the project.

Brooks and Gardner authorized Saf T Lok to pay $5,000 to an unidentified securities analyst to write a trumped-up forecast about Saf T Lok that was later distributed by State Street Securities in New York, now known as Taylor Stuart Financial.

Saf T Lok (Nasdaq: LOCK) closed at 25 cents, unchanged.

stephen_pounds@pbpost.com



To: afrayem onigwecher who wrote (396)2/15/2001 3:38:06 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 460
 
OSH - I am a scam artist ...

Posted by Michael Calderone on March 26, 1999 at 07:20:05:

Hello out there ... I would like to tell you who I am and what I do for a living, my name is Michael Calderone and I live in Las Vegas, Nevada. I run the web site www.stockup.com and also run several other scam sites like www.investoraware.org. My main goal is to spike interest in a particular stock by using my dishonestly gained database of investors to send out biased information about a stock to stimulate investors to increase the activity on the stock. Before I do this I buy the stock at the lower rate and when investors act on my information I then sell the stock for a profit. You have seen me in action with such stocks as Safe-T-Lock, Oshmans Sporting Goods and Tab Products. You can contact my office at 1-888-632-4653 or 1-702-648-6400. My office is located at 333 N. Rancho Drive, 9th Floor, Las Vegas, Nevada 89106.

Thank you, you bunch of SUCKERS.

google.com



To: afrayem onigwecher who wrote (396)2/22/2001 6:12:58 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 460
 
Stock touts in history

By: afrayem $$$
Reply To: 24 by BullByTheHorns2 $ Tuesday, 4 Apr 2000 at 8:19 PM EDT
Post # of 303


When PFER gets on NASDAQ
I think it would be an extreamly good bet that the stock price will explode as MAJOR BUYING INSTITUTIONS will then be able to invest and they will certainly want some IMO. Small float + strong hands = BIG BIG BIG PRICE INCREASE + SPLIT or SPLITS IMHO! I can hardly wait! Qualcom move over is what I am thinking. HA HA HA LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

(Voluntary Disclosure: Position- Long; ST Rating- Buy; LT Rating- Strong Buy)

ragingbull.lycos.com



To: afrayem onigwecher who wrote (396)2/22/2001 6:17:15 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 460
 
The Dumb get Dumber

By: afrayem $$$
Reply To: 30 by punchy $$$ Thursday, 27 Apr 2000 at 10:03 PM EDT
Post # of 303


What's next????

I have refrained from commenting on the current PFER stock price situation while volatility prevailed and NASDAQ followed the expected laws of gravity. Like Icarus it has imploded in flames which are still burning. Apart from gnashing of teeth over wouldn't it have been great if we had sold four weeks ago, what has changed with PFER – except a temporary price loss as markets' fell and those margined on other stock being forced to sell PFER to cover margin calls. See my Dec post which predicted this probability.

OK smart person,. Why didn't you sell? Simply because I am not a trader and nothing in the last few weeks has changed pfer's basically strong fundamentals. What are these? My answer will cover some questions that have been put to me in the last three weeks.

NAZ sc listing. Initiated and should be completed . Absence of any recent news is, as stated in other posts by others talking to the company, because more price movement can be generated by holding back until institutional investors can buy in. Also, issuing press releases while your investors are selling your stock to cover their other margin calls, would be counter productive.

Anyone got anything to add, let us all know. If not sit back. Frustrating as this has been, hold on to your shares waiting for news releases that will come with NAZ sc listing. If not, we are all in trouble as new financing is needed to cover cash burn. However, I go back to the point I don't think this group of experienced businessmen, running profitable companies, would have bought into a company that is not going to succeed. They know one #### of a lot more than we do about what PFER prospects are. Sit back, try to relax and live with your original confidence in this company's fundamentals.

(Voluntary Disclosure: Position- Long; ST Rating- Buy; LT Rating- Strong Buy)

ragingbull.lycos.com



To: afrayem onigwecher who wrote (396)2/22/2001 6:20:07 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 460
 
I am tellin ya that everything I said was the truth so help me Skupper.

By: afrayem $$$
Reply To: 37 by Truthseeker $$$ Friday, 9 Jul 1999 at 7:24 PM EDT
Post # of 132


There is a lot of talk that you are spreading false rumors about SKUP to your followers, is that true? You don't spread lies to depress the price of the stocks you short, do you? Were you really a corrupt dealer? I cannot believe that someone as respectful as you would be a corrupt person. Please tell me it isn't so, because I would be very disappointed to know you are not honest

Raging Bull Advertisements Tomorrow, the market closed at:
Quote.com: Powerful tools for serious investors.
Open an account at Schwab. Get a RIM957

ragingbull.lycos.com



To: afrayem onigwecher who wrote (396)3/3/2001 4:31:47 PM
From: StockDung  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 460
 
Afrayem, whats up with MYGIG? You cant even download it from thier site.

content.mygig.com

Microsoft OLE DB Provider for ODBC Drivers error '80004005'

[Microsoft][ODBC Driver Manager] Data source name not found and no default driver specified

/product/download.asp, line 6



To: afrayem onigwecher who wrote (396)4/18/2001 1:09:44 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 460
 
Last Price:0.009 at 12:01 EDT, Afrayem, when you gonna change the header on the SKUP/PFER board? Its tradition on SI that you change it.

Don't be a sore DOGLOSER about it.

Subject 25065

CHEERS CHUMP!!