Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (28054)	2/11/2001 1:09:08 PM
From: Paul Engel	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

Re: "). XScale has an awful lot of the original StrongArm design, but Intel admittedly had to make a lot of changes to the design to produce it anywhere other than the Hudson fab, so you are correct. " Of course I'm correct. And by the way - your claim "Intel wound up with the StrongArm by accident when they bought the Hudson fab, it appears as if they had no idea what to do with it for a long while" is BOGUS. How the hell could Intel be developing the XSCALE processor if they DIDN'T know what to do with it? You think these developments happen overnight - like the ClawHamsters and MusKanks and PaloLato's?