Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Scumbria who wrote (65767)	2/11/2001 3:38:52 PM
From: Dave B	Respond to of 93625

Like when George Bush Senior arranged a drug transaction in front of the White House, so that the dealer could be arrested, and he could talk about it in his speech? Changing the subject again? If it gives you a hint as to one of my issues with you, let me ask you a couple of questions. What does what GB or RR or WJC have to do with Carl lying? If they lied, does that make it okay for Carl to lie? If GHWB or RR lied, does that make it okay for WJC or Carl to lie? My answers to these questions are "nothing", "no", and "no". To me, these are separate events, all of which are bad, none of which excuses the others. To discuss the potential transgressions of WJC, one does not need to worry about whether or not RR or GHWB transgressed as well. One does not excuse the other. And Carls "false fact" is still a lie, and is still wrong, regardless of how many drug transactions GHWB might have arranged.