Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Nuvo Research Inc -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Joe Krupa who wrote (6733)	2/11/2001 7:50:35 PM
From: Cal Gary	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14101

Husssshhh! <ggg> Edit: I don't want to witness any broken handles. Actually you have been making some great observations lately. The cup and handle "theory" will predict a 14.50 = 9.00 + (9.00 - 3.50) target. The handle is an ascending triangle shape, looking for a possible march 1 ?? convergence. I'm not good with trend lines . Also we tested low 9.00 range twice, the rule of three says we break the resistance next time. On the other hand, the MACD has given a sell signal. Last time it did that, we got down to the low 6.00 range. Tomorrow we hear Celebrex 4Q numbers. OT Also, Napster will find out its fate tomorrow too.

To: Joe Krupa who wrote (6733)	2/11/2001 9:10:35 PM
From: Mark Bartlett	Respond to of 14101

Joe, <<Question: What do you guys think?>> It is interesting that you mention it - I was looking at the DMX chart last week, thinking the same thing. They almost always resolve to the upside - lets hope if this one completes the C&H pattern, that we are the rule and not the exception. So - yes, I obviously agree with your observation! MB

To: Joe Krupa who wrote (6733)	2/11/2001 9:35:52 PM
From: Ron Nairn	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 14101

Question: What do you guys think? This factor is still missing... Volume: There should be a substantial increase in volume on the breakout above the handle's resistance. News/end of quiet period (if indeed there is one) will validate the T/A theory. Personally I think this company is too volatile to apply T/A with any significant degree of confidence. How about this sobering thought? Remember last week the stock score was 98 and all indicators were positive? Well check this out FWIW. Type in t.dmx stockscores.com Rondo