SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: mishedlo who wrote (66760)2/12/2001 1:26:41 AM
From: chic_hearne  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 436258
 
I've never recommended to anyone on this thread to go long IBM for a long term buy. I've suggested to take no position in it and that there's better shorts out there. Given that IBM was at $114 the day of that post 6 months ago and it closed Friday at $112, I think many on this thread wish they would've taken my advice and never bet down on IBM. Lou is a master financial engineer, he ain't like his student Carly Fiorini that doesn't know how to cook the books well enough to meet expectations. He's gone soon, then we'll find out what is hidden in their financials. The day you suggested the Rambus thread ignore me it closed at $77, Friday it closed at $45. I've noticed you trying to defend it on this thread.

Why didn't you just leave me on ignore?

Message 14326224



To: mishedlo who wrote (66760)2/12/2001 9:19:52 AM
From: AllansAlias  Respond to of 436258
 
Lots of talk this weekend about long-term lines, some of it pretty loose. Here's a brafoo chart showing long-term lines on the NASDAQ composite:

geocities.com