Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Strictly: Drilling and oil-field services -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Think4Yourself who wrote (86923)	2/12/2001 11:29:02 AM
From: jim_p	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 95453

John, What it means is the OSX is near it's all time high and the bias for the price of oil in the short term is down. It's all about risk vs. reward? Jim

To: Think4Yourself who wrote (86923)	2/12/2001 11:32:58 AM
From: BigBull	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 95453

Reputable? How long do I have to wait to see $52 NG? <eom>

To: Think4Yourself who wrote (86923)	2/12/2001 12:50:18 PM
From: isopatch	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 95453

Typical Q. Nobody is "reputable" if they don't agree with you and your perma bull dogmatism. In early January, right at $10 NG, when I used figures from the work of a 20 veteran oil analyst to evidence my call for much lower NG prices, you bashed him as a ..."clown". Then 10 days ago you told the thread that EEA was providing "amateur rubbish" when they called for even lower NG prices in the months ahead. And now Big Bull presents information that's not all that difficult to comprehend considering the obvious economic slowing in the world economy as well as major oil importing nations like Japan and the US. But all you can do try to discredit simple facts by citing a wrong forecast several years ago to try and pain Bulls source as, "Not exactly a reputable agency"? Why can't contrarian viewpoints be presented here without you trying to misrepresent them as unreliable and amateur let alone bash people with vastly more knowledge and experience than you have with name calling?! Big Bull was exactly on the money with his response to you yesterday, pointing out that you don't even understand economics 101!! And this was amusing, "What's your point?" Surely you jest, Q. Bull's, Slider and MY point for OVER a month now is that the trees DON'T grow to the sky. Other than a good ST really here and there on good technicals, news or a good blast of cold weather? NG E&P stocks have put in an important top and are going considerably lower after the last of the ST rallies are over. Reasonable people on this thread can who have read all the posts on this issue, know we have been correct in our warnings to investors here. You on the other hand continue to be a great contrary indicator. Don't ever stop posting(g). Isopatch