SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Strictly: Drilling and oil-field services -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Second_Titan who wrote (86963)2/12/2001 3:09:36 PM
From: kodiak_bull  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 95453
 
Que, Iso et al:

Despite being the self-proclaimed food fight analyzer, this latest one has me puzzled. I read today's Raymond James' discussion of natgas injections/withdrawals vs. heating oil imports. The conclusion, that unsustainable fuel switching will allow a $5 or more price for NG going forward for a while seemed in line with their analysis.

Is this article what is causing this catfight or something else? Now, the request: can anyone summarize the two sides in 14 words or less?

TIA

Kb



To: Second_Titan who wrote (86963)2/12/2001 5:15:23 PM
From: rails99  Respond to of 95453
 
007: Maybe OT. NR and WPC in sale/leaseback deal. Just like HC in sale/leaseback about _ months ago.

Did not hurt HC price of stock, but I would like to know how shareholders really view these deals. Some good for shareholders, no doubt.

Sale/leasebacks free up capital for more lucrative assets. Any other ideas for when sale/leasebacks are good and/or bad? Thanks for pointing out this opp.

Rails


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News