To: t2 who wrote (18396 ) 2/13/2001 12:56:32 PM From: Tunica Albuginea Respond to of 24042 t2, I think JDSU will respond very well today to Greenspan's speech. I believe " the stars are lined up in the right direction " for JDSU today: -Rebalancing of S & P , large volume and Institutional buying today -Large number of puts that they are trying to let expire worthless at > 42.5 as well as possibly 45. -Large Put to call ratio for JDSU. -My stochastics and MACD are turning positive. - A powerful speech by Greenie who finally understood that his previous speeches had been misquoted by the liberal media and today made it very clear:" From a strictly Economic viewpoint, tax cuts are better than increasing expenditures..." And he said again and again to repeated questions of..." well should we wait to enact it ...so we can be sure it is needed yada yada... He said:" Recessions most of the time are short... However for reasons we don't know, sometimes they can be protracted and linger on.At the same time , enacting tax cuts is a legislative process that takes a long time. Now the probability of recession is quite low now, but just in case, if you are going to develop a tax cut as " an Insurance policy " against it , then it is better to develop it sooner than later " . So he is for retroactive tax cuts as an insurance against the low probability of a recession. PS: He also pooh poohed Schumer's (D) remark:" Are we going to get into the deficits caused by tax cuts of the 80's ( ie, " Reagan's " ) . He clearly pointed out the reason for those deficits: He said:" Senator, we had those deficits because spending exceeded the tax cuts." The frosting: Question:"Is it possible you could lower rates sooner than march 20 if needed?" He said:" Senator we always have that option " He also said:" I am satisfied that the productivity gains are real and that that will off set any potential decrease of the surplus through tax cuts. Capital s stock " [read JDSU here ] has been very impressive on predicatbly inreasing returns o investment, as opposed to spending on other non-productive items " . TA