SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Currencies and the Global Capital Markets -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Robert Douglas who wrote (3008)2/14/2001 5:06:13 PM
From: Zeev Hed  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 3536
 
Robert, I wonder if the "egalitarian" administration would accept a tax cut having the following "flavor", instead of changing the brackets, we should simply give implement a "floating" tax credit, let me explain. Right now the forecasts are for surpluses, and it is my opinion that a government surplus which exceed 2% of GDP, leads directly to a recession (I have explained that numerous times, and the history of prior surpluses bear witness to that tenet). So we may want to pay down some debt, at a rate that does not exceed lets say $100 to $150 Billions per year. That still leave us with big surpluses going forward. Well let say we want to shave $160 MM pr year from the tax receipts side (I would say "on the average"), and let us assume we have exactly 160 MM tax payers (counting married couples as 2 tax payers). Simply take the $160 Billion per year and give a tax credit of $1000 to each payer. That will partially alleviate the "marriage" penalty tax. It will be as fair as one can hope for (every tax payer get the same credit). Those that pay less than $1000 in taxes will pay none, and those that have their $1 billion a year in a 20% tax bracket don't really need more of a "break".

Why floating? because i think that as the visibility of future surpluses increase, we can simply pass a yearly resolutions to increase that credit or decrease it as necessary without having the haggle each year about new taxing schemes. The decision on the tax credit level can be made in the middle of the fiscal year (and I would recommend that they size the initial one in such a manner that they never have to reduce it) so there will be very good visibility as to the size of the surplus (if any) and thus the size of the "tax credit". The Democrats should love it since it is weighed to give more relief to the lower and middle income classes, the Republicans shuold love it because it treats every one the same and only people that pay taxes get credit.

Zeev