Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: fingolfen who wrote (28316)	2/13/2001 2:28:51 PM
From: AK2004	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

Fingolfen you are probably right about 300mm deal but he maybe trying to make a point regarding this *ntel roadmap. (.13/.18)^2 would just make up for the larger size of p4 but unless the yields would immediately improve on new process you still have a problem. 300mm would help the issue. Would you define for me "raw performance the Intel 0.18 micron process", please. I am not familiar with the term. I have heard that there were a number of issues with intels .18 and pIII. pIII-1.13 issues are still not resolved yet. Yields are usually estimated from total wafers committed and an output. Fab info and number of chips shipped are not that closely guarded. Regards -Albert ps did I miss a point where mth was blamed on the process?