Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Philosopher who wrote (5636)	2/13/2001 5:35:07 PM
From: Rambi	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

I do NOT concede that- I very carefully pointed out the distinction between your publicly calling a person disturbed, an indictment on a person's entire mental health, and my calling the act of doing so nasty. The ACT was nasty, not the person who committed it. It is a distinction that you, as a parent, should be well aware of. (I love you, but not what you did to the wallpaper) I have already said that I do not know exactly what X meant and that she could, if she cared, reply to that. But I know X well, and she is extremely sane, emotionally much healthier than a lot of people around here, and very empathetic. But as I reread your question, yes- I THINK (subject to change) that I might disagree that someone is morally admirable, but yes- they could be emotionally and mentally healthy.