SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Joe NYC who wrote (28447)2/14/2001 12:23:54 PM
From: fyodor_Respond to of 275872
 
Joe: As far as SSE(2), I am not sure it is patentable. I seem to recall that an instruction set cannot be patented, only implementation (correct me if I am wrong), and I am pretty sure AMD will implement it differently. Besides, I think AMD has a perpetual license for x86 instructions

Correct, instruction sets are not patentable. Intel found that out with MMX. The question remains how easy it will be to implement SSE2 without violating any Intel IP. People more knowledgeable than I have raised concerns over this, in any event.

P.S. Any "perpetual license for x86 instructions" would not cover MMX, SSE and SSE2.

-fyo