SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: The Philosopher who wrote (5807)2/14/2001 2:34:47 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
But if you accept, in your case for the sake of argument, that abortion is not morally wrong, then you get into the very challenging question of whether it is ONLY a mother's right to choose to abort or not to abort, or whether society has a right in representing its interests (or what it sees as its interests) to force abortions. That is, the moral question shifts from abortion yes or no to who has the right to decide who does and doesn't get born. A much harder question, IMO.

If for the sake of argument I was to assume that a fetus had no rights, forced abortions would IMO violate the rights of the mother. If, again for the sake of argument only, I was to assume that forced abortions where nessiary to avoid a horrible catastrophe that would at best make forced abortion a "necessary evil", but it would still be evil.

Since I don't think that fetuses have no rights, and since I don't think that forced abortions are needed to avoid a horrible catastrophe then the issue isn't difficult for me.

Another part which I am waiting on the right case to take to court is whether a man who has gotten a woman pregnant has a right either to demand that the child be aborted or to terminate his parental rights and require the woman, if she chooses to bear the child, to carry all the cost of raising it herself.

If I start with the assumption that the fetus is not a person and has no rights then this becomes an interesting question. The usual argument for the current state of the law is that the mother has to carry the child (and thus can choose if she wants to carry it or not), and that once it is born it then becomes a person with a right to be finacially supported by its parents until it becomes an adult.

Tim