Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Road Walker who wrote (127396)	2/14/2001 6:02:26 PM
From: willcousa	Respond to of 186894

Hard to think many CEO's from outside could improve the intel culture. I know, I know, we have discussed the flaws. Wish B would fix those himself.

To: Road Walker who wrote (127396)	2/14/2001 9:42:00 PM
From: tejek	Respond to of 186894

I thought Cramer made sense in that article. I don't agree that Barrett should go. Can you imagine the culture shock if Intel brought in an outsider as CEO? John, Maybe thats what's needed. When I say that, I mean to get Intel back to generating some faster growth where revenues go up more than 10% YOY. I think Barrett is good for maintaining the current pace but I think the expectations going forward may be for higher growth rate. I think this year will be an important one for Intel. The bar is certainly low enough for Intel. Consensus is $1.04 for 2001 v. $1.52 for 2000. Let's hope for a catalyst to kick start PC sales. I hoping for other catalysts that will make Intel less dependent on PC sales. ted