Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : EMC How high can it go? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: pirate_200 who wrote (12211)	2/15/2001 11:21:31 AM
From: Gus	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 17183

Look, you obviously don't understand what you're saying. Saying that RAID 0 does not have any redundancy is one thing and belaboring the obvious. Saying that RAID 0 is the lack of RAID is another thing altogether because the RAID levels are part of a classification scheme which has limited value in describing EDAP (Extended Data Availability and Protection), which has 3 major classifications: 1) Failure Resistant (lowest) - the ability to protect against data loss and loss of access to data due to a disk failure. 2) Failure Tolerant - the ability to protect against data loss and loss of access to data due to the failure of any component within the storage system, not just a disk. 3) Disaster Tolerant (highest) - the ability to protect against data loss and loss of access to data due to the failure of one entire zone of a disk system physically separated into two or more zones raid-advisory.com But it's not surprising that you're confused. You're the one who claimed that speed benchmarks also measure availability so EMC should use the same exact single-point-of-failure configuration as NTAP in order to provide a meaningful comparison and determine which software is better. LOL.