Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (132839)	2/15/2001 11:26:20 AM
From: hmaly	Respond to of 1570748

Ted Re..Apolitical....not political<<<<<<< Ted, when you said ..I was pretty much apolitical before this election.....not anymore. <<< doesn't the statement that you aren't apolitical anymore mean that you now went political. Wouldn't you be either political or apolitical. I don't beleive there is a middle ground. How many professors at Columbia do you see being interviewed on any given day? <<<<< The fact that you now see him as just a professor now; not the titular head of the dems. proves my point. Professors at Columbia don't get interviews. Titular heads do. Influential?....he beat Bush in the last election....I think there are quite a few who might be influenced by that. <<<<<<< I am more influenced that since the election and its aftermath, Al was shuffled off to teach and not given an influential position within the party. Clinton's pal McAuliff was put in charge of the DNC, and Hillary was pushed as the new candidate for 2004, while Bill got all of the influential speaking arrangements; not Al. Connect the dots.