SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Stock-Picking Challenge -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Scott Lux who wrote (2062)2/15/2001 11:59:39 AM
From: Bald Eagle  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2402
 
RE:I made the decision to use the SI portfolio's calculation.

Well, that is the easiest way to do it, I guess, but it gives unequal weight to the stocks purchased. If you have another contest, would you consider an equal amount of money invested per stock versus an equal amount of shares so as to weight the individual stocks equally?



To: Scott Lux who wrote (2062)2/15/2001 12:46:47 PM
From: Dr. Zax  Respond to of 2402
 
I think we should continue the contest as 100 shares of each, and use the % at the bottom of the SI portfolio's. It makes this game unique and forces people to think outside of their boxes.

Dr.Z



To: Scott Lux who wrote (2062)2/15/2001 1:00:29 PM
From: benwood  Respond to of 2402
 
FYI, it is possible to use the SI portfolio tracker and still give an even weighting to all stocks, by making each purchase the same dollar amount (like I do in real life, more or less). However, if I were in your shoes, I'd hesitate to set that up because of how many errors I've been hearing about with the simple 100 shares per stock rule. Still, you could hold people to doing it right or exclude them, and examples would certainly pave the way for most.



To: Scott Lux who wrote (2062)2/15/2001 1:31:38 PM
From: canuck-l-head  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 2402
 
Scott: Glad to see some finality to the "rules". I was beginning to lose all respect for this contest. Whatever arguments might suggest, IMHO, just stick to the original rules with the simplest interpretation thereof. (KISS Principle)

canuck-l-head