SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Scumbria who wrote (132856)2/15/2001 1:38:25 PM
From: Jim McMannis  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1570281
 
Scumbria,
RE:"Maybe they should ask Clinton."

Good idea...

RE:"The Reps have already convicted Clinton in the media, and haven't even produced evidence that there was a crime."

The media does a fine job of that without the Republicans. The media seems to have taken off the gloves since Clint left.
Kind of ludicrous to say the media and the Republicans are the same.

RE:"All they have so far is if there was a crime committed, Clinton might have had a motive. That seems to be all they need to send the press over the deep end wrt Clinton."

You're really missing the point...actually there are two points...
1. Was there a bribe?
2. On what merits did Clinton pardon Marc Rich?

Let's forget the first one for now...
SO, on what merits did Clinton pardon a fugitive who has been charged 51 times for fraud?
No on seems to be able to figure it out...
Hey, I have an open mind...maybe the guy got a bump rap...?
Maybe not...
Why weren't the US attorneys consulted before hand. WHy a last minute deal?
Stay tuned...

Jim