Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jraz1 who wrote (127255)	2/15/2001 2:58:43 PM
From: FastC6	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769667

I recall him lying under oath...If you think the Rich pardon is the first wrong Clinton has done I have a bridge I want to sell to you. . .

To: jraz1 who wrote (127255)	2/15/2001 3:10:31 PM
From: Lazarus_Long	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

Do two wrongs make a right? Because those two (sort of) got away with it,should Clinton? If a President commits a crime and gets away with it, does that mean any future President also can? Or do we stop the slide here?

To: jraz1 who wrote (127255)	2/15/2001 4:04:53 PM
From: Little Joe	Respond to of 769667

jraz: "Both Reagan and Nixon were involved in acts that were considered criminal offenses" Why is it that all of the Clinton defenders have to eventually resort to the defense that others did it. It seems like the actions of every president since Washington have been used as a justification for his acts. Same as the Nixon folks who argued that others did it. Maybe they did but Clinton was caught and if not impeached he was exposed. The fact that others did the same (which I don't concede) makes no difference. It is like a bank robber who gets caught justifying what he did by saying that other bank robbers got away. Little joe