Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: hmaly who wrote (133002)	2/16/2001 5:16:46 PM
From: Scumbria	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1570498

Harry, Do you think that Wilt Chamberlain remembers all of his sexual encounters? Scumbria

To: hmaly who wrote (133002)	2/16/2001 5:44:10 PM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1570498

"Forgetting about an incident from 24 yrs ago is hardly news." Um, if he cannot recall all the times he has been arrested no matter how long ago, then we have only seen the tip of the iceberg... "it would be quite easy not to remember the incident as an arrest" Ok. Maybe it was a more common occurance that I imagine and he just sort of got used to it. What can I say? I remember everytime I got stopped for speeding, but that didn't happen very often. But if Smirk had to deal with cops stopping him all the time... "Delegates to any party conventions are usually very active members." So? And this means he did it under the direction of the Gore campaign? Sorry, it's a stretch. " Frankly both are probably lying, but GW's story is far more plausable; and the investigators agreed." I dunno if they really agreed. After all, to investigate a son of a sitting President would require an awful lot of intestinal fortitude. Of course, that was before the little deal with Neal came out, the Bush Boy's can't seem to be able to stay away from shady activity, can they? "Why would that help GW?" Because then he could decline by making it look like he was way behind and needed every advantage he could get? "the contention was that Al was raising soft money 2-1" Well I guess the phrase "he is out-spending me 2 to 1" can be construed as that... "I doubt if either candidate knows exactly how much money each candidate has raised in soft money" I guess those strategy sessions for fund raising and all are spent talking about sports, then? And if he didn't have a clue, which you are certain of, why did he state it so forcefully? The number of potential statements he could have used was very large, so why did he pick something out of the air which he had no idea of it's veracity without qualifying it at all? He was pretty convincing, as you would expect from someone who does such things habitually... Face it, there is plenty of proof that Smirk lies at the drop of a hat. You can spin and apologize all you want, but this is an obvious and glaring flaw in his character.