Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Left Wing Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Win Smith who wrote (4132)	2/16/2001 8:52:09 PM
From: Poet	Respond to of 6089

Interesting. I'm continually amazed at how the press tries to make it sound as though the Clinton administration invented every crime from bribetaking to petty thievery. Looks like a longstanding "tradition" to me.

To: Win Smith who wrote (4132)	2/17/2001 1:51:33 PM
From: melinda abplanalp	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6089

Don't you know it's not fair to talk about what the Republicans take. It's nasty, you know. It's only cultured to talk about it if you are a Republican bashing Bill. Then it's o.k. You see. Mel

To: Win Smith who wrote (4132)	2/18/2001 7:38:29 PM
From: Mephisto	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6089

Thanks, Win, I recall the Jackie controversy. I believe she wanted to take more than antique tables! And, of course, no one can beat the Reagans for sleaziness!! I believe donors paid for Nancy Reagan's Inaugural gown, the controversial White House China, and donors paid, initially, over 2 million dollars for their retirement home in California. Recently, Nancy said they paid rent and paid the money back for that house. What about the upkeep and improvements? I'll believe Nancy only when she publishes the endorsed checks for the gift of a retirement home. Let's not forget the free designer gowns that Nancy wore. After the Reagans left office, the IRS made them pay income tax on those gowns.