Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (133039)	2/17/2001 7:14:57 PM
From: hmaly	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1570499

Combjelly Re..Very weak. To be pulled over for DUI or DWI and to forger it seems rather odd. <<<< Why would that be odd? The insurance drops it from your record within 6 yrs., the DMV drops it within 7. What is there to remind you often enough such that you would keep it in your memory. I will bet you that you can't even remember things from 5 yrs ago much less 25. And if you think you can take a test. Tell me every class you took when you were in first grade and the grade you got. Can't do it. Not many people can, and they took those classes every day for 4 months. On the other hand if you ask specific questions such as Did you take an English class while you were in first grade, you might remember. Same with GW. If the question was, Did you ever get arrested for drinking when you were young." would narrow the search down such that your mind could recall it easier. Its just like a search on the internet. If you don't do your searches properly by asking the right questions, you are not likely to get your answer. Him being a delegate to some unspecified convention just means he was a bit more active than most, <<< To say a delegate is "A bit more active" is ridiculous. Ted is a bit more active than most democrats. A delegate to the democratic convention would have to have been in the top 1/1000 % of the active members in the state. It is always done that way. Why would this guy be different. Him being a delegate to some unspecified convention just means he was a bit more active than most, it does not prove some tenuous connection to the Gore campaign any more than any other Democrat.<<<<<< Sure it does? The democratic party is directly tied to Al Gores campaign; The DNC also has a direct connection to each state party, and this guy was an active member of the state party. Does it prove that he asked Al or his campaign about releasing it. No, I didn't say that. But there is a connection other than him just being a regular democrat. So far the only twisting of words is done by you. <<<<<<<< LOL.. Good one. Maybe if you want people to believe that, you shouldn't have typed Good point, I did confuse the two or I mixed it up once<<< in your post later on. You admit that it is you that is confusing the issue, and then you start saying it is me. Your so confused, you can't even remember how confused you are. The phrase used in the debates was spending, <<<< If you want to change the phrase to spending, lets do that. As I pointed out before, there many different groups spending money for a candidate, including the campaign itself, the parties of the candidates and special interst groups , state and local parties. Neither candidate knows how much is spent on his own behalf by the groups much less knows how much the opposition groups are spending. And if you don't know, you can't call someone a liar. He could be right. You don't know. <<<<<You mis-read, twist, spin and otherwise distort things <<<<< I do. I thought you were talking about yourself when you posted this in your post. <<Good point, I did confuse the two <<<<< Or two paragraphs later when you said this. I mixed it up once< I find it incredible that you are accusing me of being mixed up when you just said earlier in the same post that you were mixed up. The least you could do is wait a couple of posts so it wouldn't be so obvious, or were you confused? I guess you will go to any length to defend a man who shouldn't need it if he were actually honest. <<<<< Is it you contention that only the crooks deserve to defended from outrageous lies? I can see how you would feel that way being a democrat,(after all, the democrats have paid particular attention to the rights of felons and Bill) but I actually feel good people have a right to be defended too. The only way you have raised any sort of defense is to claim that he doesn't lie more than any other politician, or to twist what I posted and then claimed it was wrong. <<<<<<< LOL Are you trying to say that it was I who caused you to become confused and mixed up; which you alluded to earlier. I didn't realize I had done that to you and I apologize. I just didn't realize you would get so confused and befuddled so easily. I wish you a speedy recovery.