Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: stribe30 who wrote (133041)	2/17/2001 4:53:43 PM
From: richard surckla	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1570685

stribe... I know I have been unbanned, but i like you guys here better.<g> I have been reading the post on Moderated and there is no real talk about the article as there is on the other threads. Charles R broke the story and milo and one or two others responded, but nothing in depth was said. You still haven't answered me as to why the article centered in on SyncLinc DRAM which is not an issue in the case. Also which part specifically do you feel is bad for Rambus? Remember the entire article is pure conjecture. No facts were presented in the article. Only dates pertaining to SLDRAM. Edit after post: SyncDRAM to SyncLinc DRAM =SLDRAM. I stand corrected for my other post.