Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Robert Rose who wrote (118078)	2/18/2001 2:50:52 PM
From: Glenn D. Rudolph	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 164684

I'm sure many server farm execs are thinking the same thing. Keep in mind however that this CA energy crisis is only the tip of the iceberg. The latter very well could blossom so as to slash the juggernaut of our national economy, and become a titanic, if we do not MOVE NOW ! Rob, I agree completely. The move is a faster interim solution until more energy production is created nation wide if not world wide. There are areas with more than sufficient power generation capacity for the next few years or maybe more. It is quicker and less costly to move the server farms than to create a huge increase in power generation in the California area near term which is impossible to do.