SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Strictly: Drilling and oil-field services -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: patron_anejo_por_favor who wrote (87667)2/18/2001 8:06:02 PM
From: Don England  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 95453
 
patron,

thank you. i feel like i got something right.

ed,

sorry about your illegal operation. sometime even the docs go short when they should have gone long. just keep taking the prescribed hormones and hardly anybody will notice. i apprehend that a lot of you oil guys roll on the floor a lot - is that some sort of mating ritual? the autobahn society would probably be interested.

my best wishes go with you, don (twisted in the hi lonesome)

(once i was in the hospital dying, but i didn't, and somebody sent me one of those condolences cards that implies you already are dead. gave me pause.)



To: patron_anejo_por_favor who wrote (87667)2/18/2001 9:02:32 PM
From: isopatch  Respond to of 95453
 
"an unsustainable one at that." Agree.

So the next question becomes: What sectors will inflate in price next from all the liquidity that's being poured into the system by the FED.

Realize that's a rhetorical question considering some of the strong bull cases that are well established on the thread(g).

But I'd like to see what new or already identified sectors you think are most likely to attract this newly created liquidity during the next 6 to 12 months and thereafter. TIA.

Iso



To: patron_anejo_por_favor who wrote (87667)2/18/2001 9:04:31 PM
From: Oak Tree  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 95453
 
I'm slow. I understand why high fanny mae debt is bad -- afterall if people can't pay for their houses they can't pay for anything. But I can't understand why having money in money markets is bad. Isn't that almost like having cash? Isn't it almost like savings. Hence, if debt is increasing at about the same speed as savings, isn't that balance?