To: CVJ who wrote (127874 ) 2/18/2001 11:52:49 PM From: ecommerceman Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769670 Cjac--Sure, I suppose that a hired hand has an economic interest in the farm that he's working on, and I suppose that a Soviet farm worker had an interest in the collective farm HE worked on, but if you don't understand the difference between working as a hired hand and getting paid minimal wages as opposed to working the land you OWN (with the accompanying concern for the welfare of the land, as well), then I don't suppose we have much to say to each other.... And yes, I have no trouble with a government subsidy targeted toward family-scale agriculture, just as I have no trouble with a subsidy targeted toward enabling middle-class folks to buy their own homes. Not very libertarian of me, I'll admit, but I suspect that most Americans would support both the former and the latter, and I don't see our President-select advocating the elimination of either. If he gets a dose of "courage" (if that indeed would be what it is) to follow your wishes, let me know--but I'm not gonna hold my breath.... ____________________________Since when did being a hired hand mean one doesn't have an economic interest in a farm, or for that matter any other enterprise, like a coal mine or a car factory or a bakery or..., well you get the idea. Would you favor increasing prices of food or the gov't subsidies that help to keep prices down? The reason there are fewer and fewer small family farms and more and more corporate farms is the little matter of efficiency. Would you rather buy your milk from a supermarket which gets it from gigantic dairies with 1000's of cows, or from a small farmer with 10 cows, or milk you own cow? Things change, maybe not for all the best reasons all the time, but change is the only constant. To maintain small family farms, what price in $ and population control would you consent to? Anything has consequences; like the Chinese say, be careful of what you wish for,you may get it. Chas