SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : MDA - Market Direction Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Casaubon who wrote (69549)2/19/2001 3:35:58 PM
From: Chuck Williams  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 99985
 
Interesting to think who will buy whom in the upcomig months. If your thesis is correct, it seems like biotechs would be more and more attractive to big pharma these days.

Thoughts?



To: Casaubon who wrote (69549)2/19/2001 10:16:52 PM
From: Tunica Albuginea  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 99985
 
Casaubon:Re: Biotech. As hard as I try Casaubon I can't develop love pangs for biotech.

I don't see any great biotechs right n o w around me .
You mention Enbrel as an example.

midwestarthritis.com

Casaubon, Rheumatoid Arthritis and Crohn's disease are <B. extremely rare .
Average doc is lucky to see 10 cases over his lifetime.
This is not a case of Starbucks in every corner.
furthermore people with Rheumatoid arthritis and Crohn's become chronically ill and disabled.
They can't work after a while and thus loose good insurance and so they are likely not
to have this expensive drug paid for by somebody.So I don't see a gush of profits in this.

I think this applies to more chronic conditions. The problem remains: If a patient
can't pay for these expensive drugs who will?

TA, pessimistic about the future of expensive medicine.....