Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Patricia Trinchero who wrote (128030)	2/19/2001 12:56:49 PM
From: Don Pueblo	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 769667

Do me a huge favor, will you? Subject 21104

To: Patricia Trinchero who wrote (128030)	2/19/2001 12:59:21 PM
From: DMaA	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769667

NY Times points out lies in Clinton pardon editorial - in small print naturally: Editors' Note An Op-Ed article by former President Bill Clinton yesterday about the pardons of Marc Rich and Pincus Green stated erroneously in some editions that "the applications were reviewed and advocated" by three prominent lawyers, Leonard Garment, William Bradford Reynolds and Lewis Libby. Mr. Clinton's office and the lawyers are in agreement that none of the three men, former lawyers for Mr. Rich, reviewed the pardon applications or advocated for the pardons. During the press run, Mr. Clinton's office asked that the reference to "applications" be changed to "the case for the pardons" to try to clarify Mr. Clinton's point. Even the revised wording, however, could be read as leaving the impression that the lawyers were involved in the pardon process, which Mr. Clinton's spokesmen said was not the intended meaning. The revised wording, according to those spokesmen, was meant to refer to the underlying legal case developed by Mr. Garment, Mr. Reynolds and Mr. Libby, among others, in past years that argued that the criminal indictment of Mr. Rich was flawed. That legal analysis, according to Mr. Clinton's spokesmen, formed part of the argument that Mr. Rich's lawyer, Jack Quinn, adopted in applying to Mr. Clinton for the pardon. nytimes.com

To: Patricia Trinchero who wrote (128030)	2/19/2001 1:04:29 PM
From: The Street	Respond to of 769667

WHAT IS YOUR POINT! Like a dog chasing it's tail....

To: Patricia Trinchero who wrote (128030)	2/19/2001 3:10:46 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	Respond to of 769667

Yes and Bill and Hill are co-chairperson of the Rich restoration. IT gets Worse!! Tom Watson tosiwmee

To: Patricia Trinchero who wrote (128030)	2/19/2001 4:28:21 PM
From: JDN	Respond to of 769667

Dear, Dear Pat: The Missouri restoration has been going on long before Bush ran for President. The fact that he is the chairperson only indicates what a Patriot our glorious President is. While Clinton was busy infesting the military with gays and PRETENDING to salute, our fine President was working hard to restore a famous Battleship. ARE YOU NOT PROUD?? JDN