Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bilow who wrote (66333)	2/21/2001 1:18:14 AM
From: Dave B	Respond to of 93625

Carl, Hi Dave B; Yeah, it does gall me to have to fish for compliments here. But hey, when you're looking back through the record and find that you were tarred and feathered 8 months before for something that turned out to be very correct, how can you resist reminding people what they said before? Just grit your teeth and resist the temptation. <G> Or as they say in the revival tents -- "Flee, evil spirits, from the body of this man! Go and make him fish no more!" <VBG> I should note that you never said AMZN was a great buy, as far as I saw. Cellhigh was the guy who was playing that tune. I was a little surprised that you brought that up -- I was giving you s*t about your credibility versus the Dataquest guys, not about AMZN. The AMZN stuff was the only thing I found for you on the web (that you were participating in some stock-picking contest). NP, though. Hope you're enjoying your trip, RMBS is actually holding up tolerably well in the face of a fairly broad tech market decline.* Thanks. It'll be more enjoyable once the work is finished. Dave

To: Bilow who wrote (66333)	2/21/2001 9:07:48 AM
From: Scumbria	Respond to of 93625

Carl, when you're looking back through the record and find that you were tarred and feathered 8 months before for something that turned out to be very correct, how can you resist reminding people what they said before? The hard cores remaining on this board are inherently untrainable. They all think they made money off RMBS a few years back and they want it to happen again, and that overrides any other information available to them. Remember when Tom published his article about overclocked BX killing i820? How did Jim and Richard and DaveB react to that article? Then there was the i815 vs. i820. Same reaction. Then there was the 5% delta in price between SDRAM and RDRAM. Now they are working on the instability of DDR. No matter how many times these people are proven wrong, they cling to their fantasies. BTW: Where is Mishedlo and tech_loser_2000? Scumbria