SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Impeach George W. Bush -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mephisto who wrote (1866)2/21/2001 2:51:54 PM
From: Mephisto  Respond to of 93284
 
O. J. Simpson Finds Fame and Infamy Blur Together in Florida Haze

"With money, you can solve anything here," said Jorge Ballesteros, a
66-year-old retiree who lives a block away from Mr. Simpson."

………………………*************…………………………………..

"Last week, he was charged with the felony burglary of a vehicle after
what police described as a road rage incident led to a confrontation with
another driver. As he left the Miami-Dade County jail on a $9,000 bond,
a corrections officer shook his hand. At a post release news conference, a
fan asked for an autograph. "


By RICK BRAGG

From The NewYork Times

February 18, 2001
M IAMI, Feb. 15 — From a distance, he is just another
retiree limping on arthritic knees along the sun- splashed sidewalks,
another man with a small paunch and a solid pension, trying to
decide whether to play 18 holes or only 9.

But when people see the face, they point and shout, "Juice!" Men send
beers to his table, and young women slip him their telephone
numbers. People who were not even born when he was a star
running back for the Buffalo Bills in the 1970's, who know him mostly
from his marathon televised trial on murder charges, ask to have their
picture taken with him.

And when he rolls through his neighborhood in his luxury sport utility
vehicle, neighbors in Kendall, a comfortable suburb just south of Miami,
smile and wave. They say he is nice, a fine neighbor. But they do not like
to give reporters their names when they talk about O. J. Simpson.


Fame and infamy, it seems, blur together in the South Florida haze for O. J. Simpson.

Last week, he was charged with the felony burglary of a vehicle after
what police described as a road rage incident led to a confrontation with
another driver. As he left the Miami-Dade County jail on a $9,000 bond,
a corrections officer shook his hand. At a post release news conference, a
fan asked for an autograph.

"People like him," said Cristina Pertierra, one of the owners of
Bougainvillea's Old Florida Tavern, a fancy bar in South Miami where
Mr. Simpson occasionally goes to have a few drinks with friends.

His past is questionable, even chilling, to some people, but that is not
unusual in South Florida. Here, Latin American strongmen and drug lords have
found haven, and elected officials occasionally have ended up in court.


It was only natural, say the people who live here, that Mr. Simpson, this
region's most famous retiree and refugee, would land on their forgiving
shore.

"With money, you can solve anything here," said Jorge Ballesteros, a
66-year-old retiree who lives a block away from Mr. Simpson.

"Would I be afraid of him being my neighbor? No," said Ms. Pertierra,
who answered "maybe" when she was asked if she believed Mr.
Simpson was a killer. "Would I date him? No."

A California jury acquitted Mr. Simpson in the killing of his former wife
Nicole Brown Simpson and her friend Ronald L. Goldman in June 1994,
but Mr. Simpson was later found liable for the killings in the civil lawsuit
filed by the victims' families. He was ordered to pay them $33.5 million,
but has said he will never comply.

Instead, he left the West Coast last year and moved to South Florida,
where state law forbids the seizure of a person's house to pay a civil
penalty, and bought a comfortable house in a quiet neighborhood. He
brought his and Nicole Brown Simpson's two children, a girl who is now
15 and a boy who is 12, and enrolled them in a high-priced private
academy.

Under state law his football pension, which news reports have estimated
to be as much as $25,000 a month, cannot be garnished to pay off the
civil judgment. He has never been spotted at an early bird special.


Mr. Simpson, 53, often begins his day by driving his children to school,
then often heads for the golf course. At night, he likes to unwind with
friends — and if there are no old friends around, he easily makes new
ones.

Young women, in particular, seem drawn to him, say people who have
seen him in public.

"They don't have a problem with him," Ms. Pertierra said. She said that
may be because the killings he was found liable for in civil court were
crimes of passion.

"If he did kill her, it was because he was jealous of her," she said.


The quiet life Mr. Simpson had once said he wanted for himself and his
two youngest children has been imperfect at best. First, there were two
911 calls involving Mr. Simpson and a girlfriend last year, one in which
the police said he was slapped and kicked by the woman.

Then, in Miami on Feb. 9, his lawyers arranged for him to turn himself in
at the Miami-Dade County jail in the road rage incident.

He was charged with the burglary of an occupied vehicle, a felony; and
simple battery, a misdemeanor. The other driver, Jeffrey Pattinson of
Kendall, said Mr. Simpson ran a red light. Mr. Pattinson honked his
horn, and that, the police said, led to the confrontation. Mr. Pattinson
told the police that Mr. Simpson walked to his car, grabbed his glasses
and scratched his face.

On Feb. 9, he was photographed, fingerprinted and released, all in less
than two hours. Mr. Simpson, by all reports, seemed almost giddy. He
laughed and joked at a news conference, and said he wondered who
would play his lawyers in the movie version of O. J. and his road rage.

In his mug shot, he is smiling.


Yale Galanter, Mr. Simpson's Miami lawyer, said Mr. Simpson was
innocent, and said Miami-Dade prosecutors were not planning to ask for
jail time.

"This case will spotlight how he has been a victim" of people who want to
take advantage of his celebrity, said Mr. Galanter.

Prosecutors in Miami-Dade County said sentences in such cases usually
included anger counseling.

But it was not the crime, but Mr. Simpson's celebrity that drew dozens of
reporters to cover his surrender. It attracted network reporters in English
and Spanish — "El Jugo," The Juice, is news in any language.

Some people here say that is because Mr. Simpson is just too famous —
or perhaps too infamous — to ever move away from the killings. Others
say he cannot exist without such attention.

"He gets all this publicity, and it only makes him try harder for attention,"
said Mr. Ballesteros, who lives down the block. "He likes the attention,
and the media like to give him the attention."

Golf professionals at public courses around Miami call him a nice man.
Like a lot of retirees, he must play within the limitations of his health.
They say his arthritis seems to bother him.

"He has a little trouble getting around," said Charlie Pifer, the head pro at
International Links Miami-Melreese, a course near Miami International
Airport.

Almost everyone, when asked about Mr. Simpson, talked of feeling
sorry for his children, for the spotlight on their father.

Amy Halsey, a homemaker from Pinecrest whose daughter attends
school with Mr. Simpson's children, said there was something wrong with
the fascination with the man. "We just had our charity ball for homeless
children," Ms. Halsey said. "We didn't get a line in the press."


Only Brigitte Van Den Boom, who lives two houses away from Mr.
Simpson, seems indifferent.

"I didn't know who he was nor did I care," Ms. Van Den Boom said. But
then, she said, "I am French."

nytimes.com



To: Mephisto who wrote (1866)2/27/2001 1:15:38 PM
From: Mephisto  Respond to of 93284
 
Bush Would Have Won! Or Would he?

The Miami Herald reports on its 'undervote' recount in Dade County. The only
thing that seems clear, however, is that the election process is flawed

BY JESSICA REAVES

time.com

Monday, Feb. 26, 2001 Monday was supposed to be a really big day for the Miami
Herald. After two months of squinting and peering at half-perforated and slightly
dented ballots, a band of ballot-counters hired by the newspaper to comb through
Dade County’s so-called "undervotes" were ready to hand over a verdict.

This was heady stuff; the newspaper set up a stand-alone section of its website
and prepared for a frenzy of activity. Would the recount results fuel Democrats’
conviction that the election was stolen by a partisan U.S. Supreme Court? Or
would the new numbers establish unequivocally that George W. Bush won the
presidency?

Perhaps, the optimists thought, the partisan bickering over legitimacy would end
once the "real results" were out in the open.

Then Monday dawned and the paper hit the stands. The news was bad for the
optimists, and, to a lesser extent, for Al Gore. After two months of work, the
data were conflicting at best. In a review of 10,644 undervotes, the paper
reported, Gore only gained 49 votes (1,555 to Bush’s 1,506). Those votes,
combined with the recount numbers Gore requested from three other counties
— Volusia, Palm Beach and Broward — and subtracted from Bush’s 730 vote
lead, would still have left Gore 140 votes behind Bush in the overall Florida
count.

Of course, Bush partisans crowed over the numbers, which came, after all, from
what was supposed to be a Gore stronghold. But there were also new points of
contention, all of which will likely be advanced enthusiastically in the coming
weeks by Democratic loyalists. While the recount, conducted by accountants
BDO Siedman for the Herald, used the most generous definition of "vote" to
tally numbers, the new numbers, they reminded anyone who’d listen, only
includes undervotes — those ballots whose chads were not fully detached.

One thing the new numbers do confirm is what is now almost universally
acknowledged to have been a strategic gaffe by the Gore camp: calling for
recounts in specific counties. Apart from fueling public suspicion that he was
cherry-picking counties apparently most beneficial to his cause — a tactic that
probably fueled opposition to his cause — it also appears that he had little to gain
in terms of votes by narrowing the recounts to so few counties.

The rest, however, is not so clear-cut. The recount, we are reminded, did not
include the 1,840 ballots where voters cleanly punched holes assigned to no one,
including 736 punched in the hole directly beneath Bush’s name and 1,017
beneath Gore’s. This phantom margin, apparently created by confused or
distracted or perhaps just not very bright voters, would be, of course, enough to
secure a Gore victory. If, that is, we were in the habit of counting votes next to
or beneath or slightly to the left of where voters are supposed to register their
vote — which we are not.

And it is perhaps in those floating, unassigned hole punches that the only
agreement over this election is likely to result. It seems inconceivable that
anyone, upon learning that fully 2,000 votes were firmly cast (in one county!) for
no candidate at all, could argue against revising our balloting systems. Those
votes, which will taunt Al Gore and 2,000 apparently disoriented Dade County
residents, are a clarion call for ballot reform.


After all, we practically beg people to vote. Why, then, do we design ballots that
manage to confuse enough voters that the outcome of a presidential election
could be in doubt?

As for a more complete view of the Florida vote, that will have to wait until two
separate counts of the whole state are completed. The Herald and its parent, the
Knight Ridder chain of newspapers has counted all but two counties. (Officials
in upstate Duval and Holmes counties have postponed the recount, fearing
further disruption if the ballots were subpoenaed in lawsuits.) Meanwhile, a
consortium of news organizations, including the Associated Press, the New
York Times and CNN, has hired the National Opinion Research Center, a
non-profit firm out of the University of Chicago, to examine nearly 200,000
ballots that did not register any vote at all, including ballots where no vote was
clearly marked, and where more than one vote was clearly marked. The NORC
report is due out in April.