Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LLCF who wrote (69804)	2/21/2001 3:21:41 PM
From: flatsville	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

of course it wouldn't be so nice for foreign bagholders Yes, and that's the whole point. The U$D is a CON-fidence game. A strong dollar policy without the the promise and protection of intervention doesn't inspire CON-fidence. Mine is thrice the duration with lows down below 80... with highs near 120... so using the beginning price we have a 50% move to get back to the lows. Yes I see the chart. It didn't occur to me that the "recent" move in the U$D you were referring to might go all the way back to 1992. So you're saying a move back to 100 would be met with mere grumbling? That's a 50% of the move from 80-120. Or 50% from here? What level? (Be specific otherwise you're just tiny yapping. A notation of jty--just tiny yapping--would be helpful so I don't have to bother.)