Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jazzcat2000 who wrote (94141)	2/21/2001 3:52:47 PM
From: samim anbarcioglu	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 152472

Jazz, >>It's weird to see on CNBC, this thread I don't think there is a lack of understanding of pe here on this board, we are just pissed off at cnbc, yahoo, clearstation etc which have wrong numbers for QCOM earnings ( 10 - 13 cents), and as a result a wrong pe, 580 or some silly thing like that.

To: jazzcat2000 who wrote (94141)	2/21/2001 5:06:42 PM
From: Rajala	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

>annual earnings per share which is something like >$1.24 for the current year. Actual PE currently is >about 60. Hmmm... very interesting. So the "actual PE" is calculated for the current year. As the current year is now, let me check my calendar, hmm yes at around February, it means that we still have 10 months to go. In other words we have to work the Chinese deals into the "actual PE" also (as anyone who has followed this thread the past 6 years knows the next big juicy Chinese deal is just around the corner). After doing the math I have arrived at the "actual PE" of mind-bogglingly low 0.26 Obviously the stock is severely undervalued and any talk about Q´s real PE being 500+ is pure eurocommunist propaganda. - rajala