Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : All About Sun Microsystems -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: QwikSand who wrote (41429)	2/21/2001 5:59:32 PM
From: Charles Tutt	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 64865

I just noticed that SGI was up today. Now THERE'S a hoot! JMHO. Charles Tutt (TM)

To: QwikSand who wrote (41429)	2/22/2001 3:49:19 PM
From: chic_hearne	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 64865

I certainly don't know anything but I don't think we'll see SUNW at $15 even after they warn tomorrow. So you think they warn tonight? That sure would be ironic, the day I'm offered OT in March building rs6000's and all. <GGG> I think this USIII situation is a much bigger mess than anyone is speculating. I was correct almost a year ago when I said this puppy was MIA, but I was wrong about the consequences. I thought SUNW's inability to get new product to market would have an immediate impact. Instead, SUNW's inability to get new product to market is having more of a delayed affect [which we are starting to see now IMHO]. Now that I've been in the biz a while longer, I'm understanding these decisions aren't made over night, more likely over months and usually being part of a multi-year plan. So SUNW's ultraSparc III debacle didn't have an immediate impact upon business, but the seeds were planted for future problems. The insiders sure picked a good time to sell, didn't they? chic

To: QwikSand who wrote (41429)	2/24/2001 1:48:08 PM
From: cfimx	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 64865

what u r not acknowledging is that managment is RESPONSIBLE for the absurdity in its trading last year. ergo, they r RESPONSIBLE for where it is now. Remember 40% growth rate? sub 10% is a long way from that. ever heard of UNDER promise and over deliver? Scott and co HAVEN"T. Any FOOL could have seen that 40% growth was unsustainable. Yet they sanctioned it and now ridicule the analysts for parroting what they SAID. This isn't over by a long shot. In fact, it's ONLY inning four. Do I expect a bounce? I've been waiting for one and hoping for one.