Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Steve's Channelling Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: megazoo who wrote (11552)	2/22/2001 3:14:08 PM
From: Zeev Hed	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 30051

I personally believe that this is a lot of sour grapes. Everyone is blaming AG for the decline, the real culprit, is the fact that people threw good money after those dot.com, overspent on technology, increased capacity (I yelled too much capacity in the semi just six months ago), and now we are paying the piper. The market is cyclic, AG would have probably lowered by .25% on Dec 19th, but with Bush visiting with him a day before, he just could not do that, for fear of appearing dependent on the executive branch. Zeev In edit, just jumped back into BRCM at $63 and BRCD at $41, also got some bu$$ stuff here at $37.25 and some QCOM at $64-3/4. I got hit by VTSS at $49-3/4, what is happening there, all my outrageosu bids are filling. AMCC filled at $33.125MERQ at $61-3/4 and SCMR at $19-3/4.