Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : TSIG.com TIGI (formerly TSIG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ditchdigger who wrote (44714)	2/22/2001 6:35:59 PM
From: BishopsChild	Respond to of 44908

I'm still waiting for the damn Investment Banker........................

To: Ditchdigger who wrote (44714)	2/22/2001 7:29:38 PM
From: ztect	Respond to of 44908

Ditch, the merger wasn't even contemplated before the last 10K. The time frame for announcing the intent to acquired, then negotiating and finalizing the deal was within the past 6 to 8 months, with the deal only be finalized as of 11/29/00. There were plenty of red flags to indicate that this may be more of the same old same old, but getting audited numbers of a private company wasn't one of them within the time limits of the deal, and the 8-K filing. Now per the filings, if the breaches listed as the reason for the "buy back" aren't allowed to be cured, or then subsequently challanged by the "parent", then the parent's shareholders should make that challange to prove that unremediable breaches actually occurred and the numbers claimed to be achieved published in PR's and in a SEC filing were actually what they were claimed to be. Seems Affinity and tsig, always knew which carrot to dangle in the particular market climate of the day. So yes wishful shareholders, kept wishful and stary eyed potentially because of fraud. z