SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Scumbria who wrote (133517)2/23/2001 5:21:21 PM
From: 5dave22  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1570293
 
The media just can't get enough of Clinton. They'll cover him, good or bad. Just look at their exciting alternative.

I watched a LOT of the inauguration. MSNBC would cut away from Bush, practically mid-speech because Bill sneezed. It was hilarious.

I had just seen "Gladiator" and it cracked me up. It was the same thing, Cesar was pissed because the 'other guy' was getting all the attention.

Dave



To: Scumbria who wrote (133517)2/23/2001 5:29:55 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1570293
 
Scumbria,

Sounds like the media is every bit as excited as when they decided that Vince Foster was murdered.

The irony of all this is that all they can talk about is the $$$. For me the true negative in these pardons is the one received by the guy who had done his first drug deal. Inspite of pleas on his behalf from Cardinal Mahoney and several other well known public officials as well as a sheriff, I seriously question whether the guy deserved the pardon.

But instead the focus is on the sleazeball Clintons making more $$$ at the public's expense. They think that a Rhodes Scholar and an attorney/Senator would be that stupid. If they were going to steal, I have to believe that they would have been far, far more clever.

But, of course, these maniacal people, screaming at the top of their collective lungs, are probably the same ones who voted for Bush.

ted