SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Get At The Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Dr. Stoxx who wrote (5)2/25/2001 12:46:04 AM
From: westpacific  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 467
 
Agree, disagree with Jenna, call her what she is "a pump and dump queen" and be banned from her site.

Disagree with one of her pics and be banned from her site!

Is this the intended use of SI, is what she doing legal! I mean she posts pics and then does not disclose if she has a position in the stock and when was her entry.

I feel anyone that posts stock picks on SI - has a legal position to disclose if they own - long or short and on what date they entered the stock.

Otherwise this is front-running. Tokyo Joe was fined by the SEC for this same type of action by the SEC. So be warned to anyone on SI that posts pics they had better disclose the above.

SI needs to put a stop to these paid hypesters here, this is a public forum. And there are many using this place to make money off the SI memebership.

Time to put a stop this this at once.

West



To: Dr. Stoxx who wrote (5)2/26/2001 9:17:20 PM
From: KM  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 467
 
I was asked at one time during the summer/fall to participate in the MG chatroom which was started by Pristine (and which subsequently failed, I believe, but I could be wrong) as some type of moderator. I agreed to do a few "dry runs" prior to it being open for business. I decided to put aside my instinctive mistrust and dislike of whatzername and give her the benefit of the doubt. Well, after about two days of listening to endless preaching, pontificating, poor calls and self-aggrandizement, I realized that I had been on the right path before - that not only was this not a service I'd even consider paying for (I wasn't asked to, btw), but I didn't even want to be associated with it as a moderator. I have heard many claims of this person making seven figures a year from the service alone. To that I say, it is impossible for me to believe that there are that many ignorant people out there who still have money to throw out on this trash.

This person and that g&*(&*(m site really annoy me to the extent I don't even want to log onto SI as much as I used to because my blood pressure rises when I see the thread on the hot list. That has to be manipulated in some way.

It's not only her, although I think she's the worst of the lot, but all these other "private site" monkeys - even this great white shark dude (the self proclaimed best trader on the planet), who get me going. On the other hand, look at Alan Farley or Vadym Graifer and Chris Schumaker, who really are professionals and offer valuable information FOR FREE . . . and Tom, you've also been very good about sharing your thoughts and processes.

Hah. Now I feel twenty pounds lighter <G> Dumping a gallon of bile will do that for you.