Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Skeeter Bug who wrote (118536)	2/25/2001 1:16:39 PM
From: Mark Fowler	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 164685

I have my successes and failures just like you guy...But i'm very content with myself, very resourceful and still wealthy. I have contributed most of my succcesses in the stock market since 1992 bull run and not failures of one yr. For me it's easier to cut losses and let my winners run. Another point i'd like to make with you, i don't think your in any kind of position to be making judgements a bout my wealth, nor failures and successes because you don't know a damn thing about me have a nice life. ;)

To: Skeeter Bug who wrote (118536)	2/25/2001 5:22:09 PM
From: Glenn D. Rudolph	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 164685

To:tippet who wrote (7189) From: Alomex Tuesday, Jun 23, 1998 4:48 PM View Replies (2) \| Respond to of 118569 There are no fundamentals here. I disagree. We have rapidly growing sales and a fortune being spent in advertising and placements. It is not hard to envision Amazon three years hence as a well established presence on the Net, spending near zero in advertisements. This alone would place AMZN back on the black. IMHO, a company that would be profitable today if only they did not advertise, most definitely has fundamentals. Message 4982037