Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Pro Choice Action Team -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Poet who wrote (655)	2/26/2001 1:31:11 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 948

"...Why don't you take a stab at Mr. Barry's questions..." robert stated something as a scientific fact that is not observable or demonstrable. I pointed that out. He poses a question that is theological. The basis of this theological area is the judgement of souls. If one sincerely believes in the existense of souls, then it is in reference to a God who has authority over such things. robert references souls in the context of an authoritative God. The only authorities in existence on the subject relegate the decision of judging souls and determining the condition of individual souls after death to God and God alone. I have pointed that out to robert on many occasions. He sneeringly admits his only purpose in posing this question is to agitate anyone who seriously has concern for babies and children. He goes so far as to revel in his enjoyment of determining the fate of babies by killing them and what a good deed he is performing on their souls. If you take all of this as serious then I invite you to deal with his improbity on this topic. "Are you completely incapable of having a discussion..." You are too predictable. BTW, I have never seen you have a discussion with anyone on any topic. Try it. Growth is a wonderful thing.