Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Home on the range where the buffalo roam -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Boplicity who wrote (10857)	2/26/2001 4:25:26 PM
From: Jim Willie CB	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13572

a man after my own heart: Abolish the Fed a bunch of hacks who feed cocktails to a drunken party and veer off the road on a vehicle already heading downhill Prez Monroe knew it was a mistake for the 45th time yes Gregoire, let the techs find some stronger legs first BuzWeek reports that inventories have worked down sizably they expect at least 0.5% to be pared off the soon to be revised Q4 GDP that will revise it to below 1.0% growth for Q4 could be scarey, signaling recession could be promising, signaling end of bloated inventory how is your inventory, Greg ? it is located below the pectorals, and above the belt if inventory is real big, the belt is lower than it should be / jw

To: Boplicity who wrote (10857)	2/26/2001 4:30:08 PM
From: bowledover	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13572

Greg, I understand and agree about the potential for even more problems if they cut early and the market doesn't respond. And it does appear that would likely happen. On the other hand, no cut in the next week and probably the market heads for 1900 as you, I think, and others have suggested. Problem is, how much lower after that? My impression is a lot of businessmen claim a need for a quick cut. Is this gratuitous or a real issue for them? Re no Fed. etc., I don't think a Darwinian world is a civilized world and vice versa. :^ ) bowledover

To: Boplicity who wrote (10857)	2/26/2001 9:24:52 PM
From: Kayaker	Respond to of 13572

"We believe the stock market is playing a dangerous game of reliance on the Fed and the Fed only as the sole reason to buy stocks," Belski continued. cbs.marketwatch.com