Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Right Wing Extremist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (5382)	2/26/2001 5:00:53 PM
From: CVJ	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 59480

My comment was mostly tongue-in-cheek, but now that you mention it... When you sell your CD to a used recording store, you sell the original and presumably don't retain a copy you made. If you do retain a copy, are you violating some law? I don't know and am not a lawyer and don't even know any lawyers; I am just curious. Isn't the principle the same as Carrol Shelby suing and winning cases over people making copies for sale of his 30 year old 427 Cobra sports car? And Napster is effectively shut down now, even after trying to charge for their service and sharing with the copyright owner. Chas

To: Neocon who wrote (5382)	2/26/2001 5:23:50 PM
From: Zoltan!	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 59480

The problem with the recording industry isn't Napster, it's lousy product. That explains the sales decline. Gnutella. help.com download.cnet.com

To: Neocon who wrote (5382)	2/27/2001 5:18:37 PM
From: Raymond Clutts	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 59480

Neo, I must disagree with you about Napster's "entitlement" to exchange copyrighted content among individuals who did not originally purchase it. Let's begin by addressing this through a close comparable analogy. You (we will suppose) write a textbook the content of which is supremely insightful. That text wins universal accolades and is adopted for use throughout all similar curriculums. Someone likes it well enough to scan its content into a readable (ie downloadable) format, posts the text (all 600 pages with graphs) on a web site and permits copies of that text to be downloaded and printed without restriction. Does that scenario differ significantly in any manner from the musical piracy that Napster encourages? I would say that the only difference is whose ox is being gored here. Your entitlement to reap the rewards of your labor as a writer and that of Rod Stewart as a musician are in no way significantly distinguishable. You just don't want to pay for Rod the Mod's riffs any more than your students want to pay for your doubtless informed cogitations. The copyright law's authorization for "fair use" exceptions are not applicable to wholesale freebooting.