SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
SI - Site Forums : Silicon Investor - Welcome New SI Members! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (14492)2/27/2001 9:20:05 PM
From: Dr.MensaWannabe  Respond to of 32873
 
double post



To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (14492)2/27/2001 9:20:05 PM
From: Dr.MensaWannabe  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 32873
 
I followed your link to see if the 23 names are listed on the site. I could not find
the list of names.

I did find this:

"Indeed, Silicon Investor will revoke service to anyone who uses its message boards
to invade another’s privacy. See go2net.com
(terms of service)."

This is factually incorrect for two reasons.

The enforcement guidelines set forth the procedure for those that invade the privacy
of others. It is not automatic termination.

Secondly, Silicon Investor has allowed several members to invade the privacy of
another on multiple occasions without following the enforcement guidelines.

This fact has been brought to the attention of legal counsel at Info Space. It may be
brought to the attention of the ACLU since their motion is not factually correct.

It should be noted that Silicon Investor states the following:

"Again, please keep in mind that we can and will deviate from these guidelines in the best interest of the SI community, as determined by the SI Administrators. "

We must presume that the deviation of the enforcement guidelines concerning the invasion of privacy of a private individual has been deemed for the best interest of the SI community. For what reason is still yet to be determined.



To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (14492)3/7/2001 10:37:39 AM
From: long-gone  Respond to of 32873
 
re: freedom

See this TRIPE?
telegraph.co.uk